Kansas Court of Appeals
Stephen D. Hill
Retention vote scheduled for November 3, 2026
Court of Appeals record review should combine published opinions, retention history, public discipline records, and news.
How to research a retention question
Review appointment and service history, authored or joined opinions, disciplinary information, prior retention results, and any evaluation methodology. A small set of matched opinions is not a complete judicial record.
Current snapshot
Judges scheduled for research
Kansas Court of Appeals
Tom Malone
Retention vote scheduled for November 3, 2026
Court of Appeals record review should combine published opinions, retention history, public discipline records, and news.
Kansas Court of Appeals
Jacy J. Hurst
Retention vote scheduled for November 3, 2026
Court of Appeals record review should combine published opinions, retention history, public discipline records, and news.
Kansas Court of Appeals
Lesley A. Isherwood
Retention vote scheduled for November 3, 2026
Court of Appeals record review should combine published opinions, retention history, public discipline records, and news.
Kansas Court of Appeals
Amy F. Cline
Retention vote scheduled for November 3, 2026
Court of Appeals record review should combine published opinions, retention history, public discipline records, and news.
Kansas Court of Appeals
Kim R. Schroeder
Retention vote scheduled for November 3, 2026
Court of Appeals record review should combine published opinions, retention history, public discipline records, and news.
Kansas Court of Appeals
Lori Bolton Fleming
Retention vote scheduled for November 3, 2026
Court of Appeals record review should combine published opinions, retention history, public discipline records, and news.
Kansas Supreme Court
Eric S. Rosen
Retention vote scheduled for November 3, 2026
Review official opinions, biography, appointment history, retention results, and news coverage before summarizing judicial record.
Kansas Supreme Court
Larkin Walsh
Retention vote scheduled for November 3, 2026
Review official opinions, biography, appointment history, retention results, and news coverage before summarizing judicial record.
Coverage limits
Opinion matching is automated and may omit opinions, include panel participation rather than authorship, or lag current court records. The number of matched opinions is a coverage count—not a score, productivity measure, or evaluation.